<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Fri, 24 Feb 2012 06:57:15 GMT--><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:rss="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"><rss:channel rdf:about="http://www.jamiegator.com/posts/"><rss:title>Posts</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.jamiegator.com/posts/</rss:link><rss:description></rss:description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><dc:date>2012-02-24T06:57:15Z</dc:date><admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.squarespace.com/">Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</admin:generatorAgent><rss:items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jamiegator.com/posts/2012/1/30/why-floridas-primary-matters.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jamiegator.com/posts/2012/1/18/are-you-smelling-what-the-barack-is-cooking.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jamiegator.com/posts/2012/1/5/forced-unionization-by-rule-of-law-wtf.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jamiegator.com/posts/2011/12/28/should-we-settle-for-the-gop-nominee.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jamiegator.com/posts/2011/12/18/top-10-obama-2012-campaign-slogans.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jamiegator.com/posts/2011/10/26/bho-math-genius-and-the-architect-predicts.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jamiegator.com/posts/2011/10/10/fantastical-hypocrisy-plus-the-iphone-4s.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jamiegator.com/posts/2011/7/10/we-dont-need-no-stinking-jobs.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jamiegator.com/posts/2011/7/3/does-perpetual-campaigning-create-jobs.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jamiegator.com/posts/2011/4/13/4-trillion-over-12-years-is-laughable.html"/></rdf:Seq></rss:items></rss:channel><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.jamiegator.com/posts/2012/1/30/why-floridas-primary-matters.html"><rss:title>Why Florida's Primary Matters</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.jamiegator.com/posts/2012/1/30/why-floridas-primary-matters.html</rss:link><dc:creator>JamieGator</dc:creator><dc:date>2012-01-30T23:45:40Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Elections Florida GOP Momentum Money Primary</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For all those people who live outside of the state of Florida, why should you care what happens in the Florida primary tomorrow? The answer is simply that it's about momentum and money.&nbsp; Whoever wins tomorrow gets the entire 50 delegates that are up for grabs.&nbsp; This is the first 'real' primary.&nbsp; Florida's primary is a closed primary.&nbsp; Only registered Republicans get to vote for the Republican nominee.&nbsp; (I know that there are campaigns from the left that instruct their constituents to register Republican for the primary to vote for the person they perceive as the weakest against Obama.&nbsp; This is an old game and frankly most people find it very inconvenient so I doubt it has much result.)</p>
<p>We Floridians wanted to have more of an impact on deciding whom the eventual nominee, (from either party), will be to run for President of the United States.&nbsp; I think we got what we wanted.&nbsp; Three out of the 4 states, (Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada, and South Carolina), that were traditionally before Florida in the primary season moved up their election dates.&nbsp; Nevada was the lone holdout. We Floridians feel that we can decide when we hold an election where only Floridians will be voting.&nbsp; In other words stay out of our business. (This aligns nicely with State's rights initiatives)</p>
<p>I must say that after 2000 any news that isn't about hanging chads in reference to Florida is welcome news. Whoever wins tomorrow's delegates certainly has the leg up in regards to donations.&nbsp; The rest of the nation sees the number of delegates for the leader as a portend of an effective leader and communicator that will eventually win the nomination.&nbsp; In other words whomever wins tomorrow most certainly has the look and smell of a winner.&nbsp; Winners attract all the big money and small money alike from the party faithful.&nbsp; While tomorrow's primary won't settle whom the nominee will be it will certainly give the winner a huge advantage in money and momentum.</p>
<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 400px;" src="http://www.jamiegator.com/storage/post-images/Large%20RepElephant.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1327973372161" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.jamiegator.com/posts/2012/1/18/are-you-smelling-what-the-barack-is-cooking.html"><rss:title>Are You Smelling What the Barack is Cooking?</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.jamiegator.com/posts/2012/1/18/are-you-smelling-what-the-barack-is-cooking.html</rss:link><dc:creator>JamieGator</dc:creator><dc:date>2012-01-18T23:58:19Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Economy Obama campaign promises failure jobs stink</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4><span style="font-weight: normal;">We are 3 plus years into the 'Jobs' President and still NO JOBS! &nbsp;If this Presidency states over and over that their focus is on jobs, does that make it true? No matter your political persuasion the stink of failure on the jobs front is way upwind of where you are. </span>&nbsp;Are you smelling what the Barack is cooking?</h4>
<p>Let's look at the facts:</p>
<h3><strong>Does today's announcement that Obama is putting the Keystone pipeline on hold lend any credence to his critics that he is all talk and no bite at least when it comes to jobs?&nbsp;</strong></h3>
<p><a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2012/01/18/obama%E2%80%99s-forced-keystone-decision-rejects-jobs-energy-and-logic/" target="_blank">Building the pipeline would bring over 700,000 barrels of oil per day and directly create 20,000 truly shovel-ready jobs</a>. The Canadian Energy Research Institute&nbsp;<a href="http://www.ceri.ca/images/stories/2011-08-24_CERI_Study_125_Section_1.pdf">estimates</a>&nbsp;that current pipeline operations and the addition of the Keystone XL pipeline would create 179,000 American jobs by 2035.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h4><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/04/obama-pivot-to-jobs_n_918902.html" target="_blank">Obama's 'Pivot' To Jobs: The Deja Vu Reel (VIDEO)</a></h4>
<p><object width="480" height="270" id="AOLVP_us_1094435817001" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000"><param name="movie" value="http://o.aolcdn.com/videoplayer/AOL_PlayerLoader.swf"></param><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"/><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><param name="flashvars" value="publisherid=1612833736&videoid=1094435817001&codever=1&stillurl=http%3A%2F%2Fpdl%2Estream%2Eaol%2Ecom%2Fpdlext%2Faol%2Fbrightcove%2Faolmaster%2F1612833736%2F1612833736%5F1094342556001%5Fari%2Dorigin29%2Darc%2D109%2D1312500313526%2Ejpg%3FpubId%3D1612833736&playerid=61371448001"></param><embed src="http://o.aolcdn.com/videoplayer/AOL_PlayerLoader.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" wmode="transparent" allowfullscreen="true" bgcolor="#000000" width="480" height="270" name="AOLVP_us_1094435817001" flashvars="publisherid=1612833736&videoid=1094435817001&codever=1&stillurl=http%3A%2F%2Fpdl%2Estream%2Eaol%2Ecom%2Fpdlext%2Faol%2Fbrightcove%2Faolmaster%2F1612833736%2F1612833736%5F1094342556001%5Fari%2Dorigin29%2Darc%2D109%2D1312500313526%2Ejpg%3FpubId%3D1612833736&playerid=61371448001"></embed></object></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h4><span><a href="http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/money/53325524-79/says-obama-pipeline-boehner.html.csp" target="_blank">Boehner: Pipeline rejection breaks Obama&rsquo;s jobs promise</a></span></h4>
<p class="TEXT_w_Indent"><a href="http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/money/53325524-79/says-obama-pipeline-boehner.html.csp" target="_blank">House Speaker John Boehner says President Barack Obama is breaking his promise to create jobs by rejecting a plan to build an oil pipeline from Canada to Texas.</a></p>
<p class="TEXT_w_Indent"><a href="http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/money/53325524-79/says-obama-pipeline-boehner.html.csp" target="_blank">Boehner says Republicans will keep fighting for the Keystone XL pipeline because the project is good for the U.S. economy because it would create thousands of jobs.</a></p>
<p class="TEXT_w_Indent">&nbsp;</p>
<h4>3 Years of Obama Job Promises</h4>
<p><iframe width="475" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/HxaT19rQ-Do" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p class="TEXT_w_Indent">&nbsp;</p>
<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2011/11/07/infographic-obamas-promise-vs-reality-in-the-october-jobs-report/" target="_blank"><img src="http://blog.heritage.org/wp-content/uploads/jobs-october-2011.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1326932600690" alt="" /></a></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 400px;">Unemployment Rate: October 2011</span></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.jamiegator.com/posts/2012/1/5/forced-unionization-by-rule-of-law-wtf.html"><rss:title>Forced Unionization By Rule of Law? WTF!!</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.jamiegator.com/posts/2012/1/5/forced-unionization-by-rule-of-law-wtf.html</rss:link><dc:creator>JamieGator</dc:creator><dc:date>2012-01-05T13:56:47Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Constitution Constitutional Rights First Amendment unions</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over at <a class="offsite-link-inline" title="Against Forced Unionization of Independent Workers" href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/against-forced-unionization-of-independent-workers/" target="_blank">Cato At Liberty</a> there is a great post about forced unionization. &nbsp;It raises the Constitutional issues of equal protection in the fact that individual rights were ignored by their representative in allowing a union to start collecting dues from individuals without their consent. &nbsp;In effect they are only representing a particular group and giving them de facto taxing powers.</p>
<p>Just one more example of blatant ignoring and trampling upon Constitutional rights.</p>
<p><span class="full-image-float-right ssNonEditable"><span><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/against-forced-unionization-of-independent-workers/" target="_blank"><img src="http://opinion.ebsarver.com/files/2009/09/trampled-constitution-300x199.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1325773161239" alt="" /></a></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 300px;">Trampled Constitution</span></span></p>
<p>Here's an excerpt (please click text or picture to read entire article):</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong><a class="offsite-link-inline" title="Against Forced Unionization of Independent Workers" href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/against-forced-unionization-of-independent-workers/" target="_blank">Over the past decade, more than a dozen states have forced independent contractors who are paid through Medicaid to join public-sector unions.In 2003, Illinois unionized home healthcare workers and imbued the Service Employees International Union with the right to collect compulsory fees from the workers&rsquo; paychecks. Democracy is thus being turned on its head: the elected representatives for the people of Illinois have chosen a sub-representative for some of the people and given that sub-representative a taxing power.</a></strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong><a class="offsite-link-inline" title="Against Forced Unionization of Independent Workers" href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/against-forced-unionization-of-independent-workers/" target="_blank">In so doing, they have severely impaired home healthcare workers&rsquo; First Amendment right of association and the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances. Without limits on government&rsquo;s ability to forcibly unionize people who indirectly receive government-funded compensation (an increasingly large group), more and more citizens will have to interact with their representatives through a government-designated intermediary (a union); our democracy will become even more dominated by special interests than it is now.</a></strong></p>
<p>Remember this when you vote in November!!</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.jamiegator.com/posts/2011/12/28/should-we-settle-for-the-gop-nominee.html"><rss:title>Should We Settle for the GOP Nominee?</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.jamiegator.com/posts/2011/12/28/should-we-settle-for-the-gop-nominee.html</rss:link><dc:creator>JamieGator</dc:creator><dc:date>2011-12-29T02:27:02Z</dc:date><dc:subject>GOP Obama politics voting</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been through 6 national election seasons and this one is shaping up to be the most contentious (on the GOP side) and most impactful. &nbsp;There seems to be a GOP debate every other week and with them another 'flavor of the week'. &nbsp;Well we are now standing in front of the provervial ice cream case and have tried all the flavors. &nbsp;None have impressed so far.</p>
<p>Should we settle for whomever makes it through the GOP gauntlet and becomes the nominee? &nbsp;There are some political romantics that enjoy the gutting of the candidates during the primary campaigning because it only makes the eventual nominee tough enough to handle the inevitable dirty negative campaigning in the general election. &nbsp;Does all the friendly fire produce the best candidate? &nbsp;Do the best candidates even want the job?</p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/republican-debate-foreign-policy-cbs-south-carolina-2011-11" target="_blank"><img src="http://static8.businessinsider.com/image/4ebafdff6bb3f7143700002a/2012-gop-debate.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1325127342846" alt="" /></a></span></span><br /><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><br /></span></p>
<p>Well the only question I can answer from the above is that the eventual GOP nominee should most definitely have our support. &nbsp;Why? &nbsp;While all the flavors you've been trying out don't light your world on fire it sure beats the sh#t flavored ice cream that we the American public bought when it was being sold as Rocky Road!</p>
<p>Bottom line is anything is better than the sh#t flavor aftertaste I have in my mouth right now. &nbsp;If only we could get some butter pecan! <span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.jamiegator.com/storage/post-images/rubio-cover-227x300.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1325127907458" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;Times are tough so voice your opinion now and vote in Nov '12.</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.jamiegator.com/posts/2011/12/18/top-10-obama-2012-campaign-slogans.html"><rss:title>Top 10 Obama 2012 Campaign Slogans</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.jamiegator.com/posts/2011/12/18/top-10-obama-2012-campaign-slogans.html</rss:link><dc:creator>JamieGator</dc:creator><dc:date>2011-12-18T22:28:58Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Obama campaign slogan idiot</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have less than 11 months until the next general election. &nbsp;In my lifetime I have never seen a more important election. &nbsp;I've started my collection of potential Obama 2012 campaign slogans. &nbsp;My twitter followers are getting a health dose of these right now.</p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://i104.photobucket.com/albums/m188/Bushwack_2006/barack-obama-liar1.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1324249059614" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p>Here are the top 10:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">#10: For The Record, We Really Thought We Could Have</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">&nbsp;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">#9: Your Long National Nightmare is Not Over</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">&nbsp;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">#8: Don't Ask What He's Done: Ask What He Says He's Done!</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">&nbsp;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">#7: Isn't It Time You Were Disappointed Again?</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">&nbsp;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">#6: Read My Lips: No New Tax Cuts</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">&nbsp;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">#5: Your Friends at the SEIU Say: Vote Obama and No One Gets Hurt</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">&nbsp;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">#4: I Wouldn't Get Your Hopes Up</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">&nbsp;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">#3: Now I'm Experienced!</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">&nbsp;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">#2: Let Us Do the Thinking for You!</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">&nbsp;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">#1: It Turns Out We Actually Can't</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">&nbsp;</p>
<p>Have fun this year but don't forget to exercise your First Amendment rights and speak up when the opportunity arises!</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.jamiegator.com/posts/2011/10/26/bho-math-genius-and-the-architect-predicts.html"><rss:title>BHO - Math Genius and 'The Architect' Predicts</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.jamiegator.com/posts/2011/10/26/bho-math-genius-and-the-architect-predicts.html</rss:link><dc:creator>JamieGator</dc:creator><dc:date>2011-10-26T23:09:55Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Architect Election Faith Genius Math Genius Obama</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've been reading the <a title="Steve Jobs - Hardcover" href="http://www.amazon.com/Steve-Jobs-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1451648537" target="_blank">Steve Jobs biography by Walter Isaacson</a> the last few days. &nbsp;I've come to the conclusion that he was a real asshole. &nbsp;As brilliant as he might have been he was just as flawed in his personal relationships. &nbsp;I'm not saying he was genius but like many geniuses throughout history the enhanced ability in one area often comes diminished skills in other areas. &nbsp;I'm still in love with my iPhone and iPad but I wonder what the personal cost was to the engineers and designers at Apple.</p>
<p>Anyway I just thought I'd state that. &nbsp;Now let's get back to a non-genius, Barack Hussein Obama. &nbsp;Did anyone else notice his deficiency in basic math skills. &nbsp;I admit my math skills aren't the greatest but damn he just plain sucks or he just plain lies. &nbsp;Here's the <a title="NRO" href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/281276/math-fun-president-obama-peter-kirsanow" target="_blank">actual quote from National Review Online</a>:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">But last week, we had a separate vote on a part of the jobs bill that would put 400,000 teachers, firefighters and police officers back on the job, paid for by asking people who make more than $1 million to pay one-half of 1 percent in additional&nbsp;<a id="KonaLink1" class="kLink" href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/281276/math-fun-president-obama-peter-kirsanow#"><span style="color: #216221;"><span class="kLink">taxes</span></span></a>. For somebody making $1.1 million a year, that&rsquo;s an extra&nbsp;<strong>$500. Five hundred bucks.</strong>&nbsp;And with that, we could have saved 400,000 jobs.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Most people making more than $1 million, if you talk to them, they&rsquo;ll say, I&rsquo;m willing to pay<strong>$500</strong>&nbsp;extra to help the county. They&rsquo;re patriots. They believe we&rsquo;re all in this thing together. But all the Republicans in the Senate said no. (Emphasis added).</p>
<p style="padding-left: 210px;">&nbsp;<span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.jamiegator.com/storage/post-images/warning_genius_at_work.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1319676462886" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<h4>&nbsp;Great article over at Hot Air <a title="Hot Air" href="http://hotair.com/archives/2011/10/06/trust-jake-tapper-to-ask-the-tough-question/" target="_blank">'T<strong>rust Jake Tapper to ask the tough question'</strong></a>&nbsp;</h4>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">&ldquo;As you&rsquo;re watching the Solyndra and Fast and Furious controversies play out, I wonder if it gives you any pause about any of the decision-making going on in your administration,&rdquo; Tapper said. &ldquo;Are you worried at all about how your administration is running?&rdquo;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">Shorter BHO answer: &ldquo;No. It&rsquo;s my administration, so why would I be worried about it?&rdquo;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">&nbsp;</p>
<p>In the not so distant past Karl Rove's nicknames were 'The Architect' by conservatives and 'Evil Genius' by liberals. &nbsp;It's obvious from the nicknames that he was good at reading the American public and directed successful campaigns based upon this ability. &nbsp;Well he has a new prediction for the next election. &nbsp;Here's an excerpt:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">Free-market champions (from Adam Smith to Friedrich Hayek to <a title="Milton Friedman - Wiki" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milton_Friedman" target="_blank">Milton Friedman</a>) and political leaders (including Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan) argued that collectivism is inherently inefficient, unaccountable and incompatible with self-government. While collectivists such as Mr. Obama may flatter themselves as omniscient, history has shown time and again that these elites lack the knowledge and imagination required to wisely allocate resources and make countless decisions. The way to improve the general level of prosperity is through free markets.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;"><a name="U502966878869XFE"></a></p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">That's why next year's election will decide more than policy differences and who is president. It is a deeper, more important clash of principles.<strong> Do we place our trust in the federal government or the people? Political debates don't get much more basic than this.</strong></p>
<p><strong>&nbsp;</strong>In this age of extreme political polarization it all seems to come down to that one statement and as for me I will choose to have faith in 'We the People' every time. &nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><br /></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.jamiegator.com/posts/2011/10/10/fantastical-hypocrisy-plus-the-iphone-4s.html"><rss:title>Fantastical Hypocrisy Plus the iPhone 4S</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.jamiegator.com/posts/2011/10/10/fantastical-hypocrisy-plus-the-iphone-4s.html</rss:link><dc:creator>JamieGator</dc:creator><dc:date>2011-10-11T00:56:05Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Dems Hypocrisy Occupy Sesame Street Violence iPhone</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 110%;">Once again <a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/hypocrisy">hypocrisy</a> reigns in the <a href="http://www.cafepress.com/allrightgear/651117">disease known as liberalism</a>. &nbsp;Media coverage has been overwhelmingly positive from the aspect that the MSM is bending over backwards to present a positive message when it comes to these #OccupyWallStreet freaks. &nbsp;They don't even realize why they are there. &nbsp;Liberal lemmings unite! (I mean occupy)</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-size: 110%;">Check out this picture from <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/down-with-email-corporations-2011-10">Business Insider</a> that illustrates either their hypocrisy or their idiocy. &nbsp;(I will give them the benefit of the doubt so I'll say they're just hypocrites.) &nbsp;You judge for youself.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 110%;"><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/down-with-email-corporations-2011-10" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.jamiegator.com/storage/post-images/down-with-evil-corporations.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1318298800966" alt="" /></a><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 500px;">DOWN WITH EVIL CORPORATIONS</span></span><br /></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Hypocrisy links:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><a style="font-size: 80%;" href="http://old.news.yahoo.com/s/ac/20111010/us_ac/10176701_five_facts_about_the_occupy_wall_street_movement"><span style="font-size: 150%;"><strong>Five Facts About the Occupy Wall Street Movement</strong></span></a></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><a style="font-size: 80%;" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2011/10/07/astroturf-on-literal-parade-occupy-dc-agitator-admits-to-paying-protesters/"><span style="font-size: 130%;"><strong>Astroturf on literal parade: Occupy DC agitator admits to paying protesters.</strong></span></a></p>
<p>Some in the media have suggested that #occupywallstreet is the left's 'teaparty' movement. &nbsp;I could expound for hours on the differences between the two movements but a picture is worth a thousand words.</p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.jamiegator.com/storage/post-images/TeaPartyVSOccupy.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1318298979357" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I also think we should keep a close eye on <a title="Occupy Sesame Street" href="http://www.tauntr.com/blog/occupy-sesame-street-gets-violent" target="_blank">Occupy Sesame Street</a>. &nbsp;There have been reports of violence and thanks to some brave individuals we have some pictures.</p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><a href="http://www.tauntr.com/blog/occupy-sesame-street-gets-violent" target="_blank"><img src="http://cdn.tauntr.com/sites/default/files/userfilesimages/OccupySesameSt.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1318298580832" alt="" /></a><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 580px;">Big Bird Protester</span></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><a href="http://cdn.tauntr.com/sites/default/files/userfilesimages/OccupySesameSt5.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://cdn.tauntr.com/sites/default/files/userfilesimages/OccupySesameSt5.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1318297767648" alt="" /></a><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 580px;">Bad Bert</span></span></p>
<p>Now on to more relevant news to me. &nbsp;My <a title="iPhone 4S" href="http://www.apple.com/iphone/" target="_blank">iPhone 4S</a> will be here Friday from <a title="Chek Lap Kok" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chek_Lap_Kok" target="_blank">Chek Lap Kok</a>. (Click the link if you really want to know where the hell that is!)</p>
<p><strong style="font-size: 150%;">May the 4S be with you!!</strong></p>
<p><strong style="font-size: 150%;"><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.jamiegator.com/storage/post-images/4S%20be%20with%20you.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1318299010979" alt="" /></span></span><br /></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.jamiegator.com/posts/2011/7/10/we-dont-need-no-stinking-jobs.html"><rss:title>We Don't Need No Stinking Jobs</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.jamiegator.com/posts/2011/7/10/we-dont-need-no-stinking-jobs.html</rss:link><dc:creator>JamieGator</dc:creator><dc:date>2011-07-10T15:22:46Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Obama common sense ineptitude jobs</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actions speak louder than words and the inaction of the Obama administration is yelling<strong> 'We Don't Need No Stinking Jobs'</strong>. &nbsp;In fact we still have money to spend because we can always raise more taxes. (I might be paraphrasing a little here) &nbsp;Is this the new version of <a title="Wikipedia - Let Them Eat Cake" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Let_them_eat_cake" target="_blank">'Let Them Eat Cake!'</a>?</p>
<p>Once again <a title="June Employment Report" href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm" target="_blank">'The Employment Situation'</a> monthly report for June was released from the <a title="Bureau of Labor Statistics" href="http://www.bls.gov/home.htm" target="_blank">Bureau of Labor Statistics</a> showing the failure to create jobs theme has continued.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">How much longer must we collectively keep being slapped in the face with obvious fallacies such as <strong>'we must spend more to create jobs'</strong>?</p>
<p>I ask you this: &nbsp;How many jobs have been created by raising taxes in our history? &nbsp;What is more conducive to encourage a small business owner to create a new job? &nbsp;Taxes, onerous regulations, mandates for health care insurance, cap-and-trade energy tax, etc.</p>
<p>Common sense tells us the answer to these questions but common sense and politics are often like oil and water. &nbsp;When they are forcibly put together the results can be very nice but often they repel each other much like Obama and jobs.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Here is a nice video from Representative <a href="http://mcmorris.house.gov/" target="_blank">Cathy McMorris Rodgers</a> that asks '<strong>Where Are the Jobs</strong>?'</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><iframe width="500" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/C-Bw0BA4PHU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.jamiegator.com/posts/2011/7/3/does-perpetual-campaigning-create-jobs.html"><rss:title>Does Perpetual Campaigning Create Jobs?</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.jamiegator.com/posts/2011/7/3/does-perpetual-campaigning-create-jobs.html</rss:link><dc:creator>JamieGator</dc:creator><dc:date>2011-07-03T11:45:31Z</dc:date><dc:subject>MSM Obama campaign jobs</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the beginning of the Obama Presidency there has been campaigning to convince us that his way was the better way to create jobs. (Despite over 200 years of American economic history to the contrary)<br />As they say the proof is in the pudding and unemployment hovers over 9% as I write this post.</p>
<p>Where are the jobs Mr. President?</p>
<p>Will President Obama's campaigning really convince people that they are better off now than they were 4 years ago? The MSM (mainstream magicians) has a much harder task this time. Following an unpopular two-term President is dramatically easier to convince the sheeple of the U.S., that a do-nothing unknown Senator should lead us.  This time the task for the MSM is to convince the sheeple that despite accomplishing nothing except historic debt that we should entrust Obama one more time and that it's not his fault. He inherited this mess!</p>
<p>It won't be so easy since we know this time that the MSM has no scruples much less journalistic integrity. The facts will be out there, you just won't find them with the MSM.</p>
<p>The not so perfect Republicans have released the first punch to the gut.</p>
<p><iframe width="500" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/kiO2iwAgbFs" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>Game On!</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.jamiegator.com/posts/2011/4/13/4-trillion-over-12-years-is-laughable.html"><rss:title>4 Trillion Over 12 Years Is Laughable</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.jamiegator.com/posts/2011/4/13/4-trillion-over-12-years-is-laughable.html</rss:link><dc:creator>JamieGator</dc:creator><dc:date>2011-04-14T00:00:06Z</dc:date><dc:subject>OMG Obama deficit fail libtard spending trillions</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How are we to do the math of Obama? &nbsp;Cut 4 Trillion dollars over 12 years. &nbsp;What will our deficit look like in 12 years? &nbsp;Let's say, God forbid, that Obama was elected to another term. &nbsp;<strong><a title="Washington Times Editorial" href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/mar/8/obama-spending-hits-new-records/" target="_blank">He's borrowing roughly $4.6 billion dollars a day.&nbsp;</a>&nbsp; </strong>I just can't fathom how bad it will be.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span class="full-image-inline ssNonEditable"><img src="http://state-of-the-nation.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/us_president_barack_obama_spending_money_for_debt_policy_speech_strategy_comic_political_cartoon_economist_funny_best_top_free_greatest1_obama_debt.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1302740431162" alt="" /></span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Here are some facts for all you fact checkers to check:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">-- the budget deficit for February hit a staggering $223 billion - meaning the Obama administration added more in debt last month than was borrowed in all of 2007.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">--Since Barack Obama was sworn in as president, each American taxpayer&rsquo;s share of the federal government&rsquo;s IOU has grown to $50 per day - more than the average cell-phone user is billed in an entire month</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">--In January 2009, the national debt stood at $10.6 trillion. Fueled by the so-called stimulus, this debt grew by $3.6 trillion in just two years. The magnitude of this amount is difficult to grasp without a comparison. Under Mr. Obama, government has been borrowing $4.6 billion each and every day.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">&nbsp;</p>
<h1 class="entry-header"><a style="font-size: 80%;" title="L.A. Times" href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2010/10/national-debt-obama.html" target="_blank">Obama spending stimulates the national debt by $3,039,000,000,000</a></h1>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong style="font-size: 150%;">Is this how a moral society endeavors to treat their children and their grandchildren? &nbsp;I think not!! I will not stand by idly and not speak out against this economic genocide!</strong></p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item></rdf:RDF>
